Video to star in Time Inc's digital future
It all, of course, chimes poignantly with the same company's recent closure of one of the world's best-known print magazine brands, Life.
Old journalism dog. New video tricks.


Labels: Bay Area News, Matt Buck, Mixpo, Twitter, Washington Post, Wired
Labels: Daily Telegraph, New York Times, newspaper video, San Jose Mercury, The Sun, The Times, Travis Fox, video journalism, Washington Post
Labels: Ananova, Belfast Telegraph, comic relief, Nottingham Evening Post, Piers Morgan, Twittervision, videojournalism, Welwyn and Hatfield Times, ZeFrank
Labels: Daily Telegraph, ITV, newspaper video, videojournalism, vlog, Washington Post
Labels: CCTV, Guardian, Newsnight, police, videojournalism
I see online video and multimedia as more like underground cinema. More grit, more edge, your grandfather would not understand it type of thing. Arty. Like a quaint one of coffee shop. Not starbucks. Edgy. The story is told, but not by the numbers like the TV dudes are used to doing.Technically I am sure the best TV Journalists are better at this, than I can ever hope to be. I would hope I am a much better print photojournalist than they are. But both mediums are losing to a changing market place. A hyper fragmented market place, so they don't have the answers either.All will be lost if we end up doing TV on the web. It has to be more like short film. Maybe they would like us to do stand up interviews in front of a darkened courthouse under streetlights in the snow. I guess my bottom line is its not TV and never will be. This is why I have never got bogged down in the whole contest thing. Its all about a couple peoples tastes. The public will be your judge.
Labels: Poynter, US, video photography, Washington Post
Labels: clip of the day, David Howell
Labels: Miami Herald, newspaper video, photographers, US
Labels: Bolton News, Daily Telegraph, Miami Herald, New York Times, The Times, videojournalism, vlog
It neatly echoes what Kurt Anderson was saying in New York magazine the other day."The irony, at least from my own perspective, is the comparison between news organizations that have traditionally worked in print and those that have traditionally worked in video - that is, local TV news stations. The magazines and newspapers have far less problem adapting to video; at least in the VJ model - that is where the reporter carries their own small camera and laptop, and produces their own stories. The magazines and newspapers ‘get it’ right away because this is they way they have always worked. Newspaper journalists have never worked with a crew. They have never had to wait in a reporting situation for ‘the pencil to arrive’."
Labels: BBC, Michael Rosenblum, videojournalism